• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think anyone running Open AI would make that call.

      Anyone in that role would be worried about Musk using end users as a way to acquire model distillation data to feed Grok with GTP.

      Musk is a direct competitor, has been feuding with Open AI for years, and he has shown that he’s totally ok with acquiring data in aggressively shady ways.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yup, but not everybody in charge of OpenAI would have a pissy self indulgent blog post about it produced under the company brand.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That blog post struck me as something pretty boring. It has the stink of a legal and PR team. What was the pissy / self-indulgent part?

          • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s all unnecessary. Cold have just said “we’re exercising our option” without all the ethical criticism.

            • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              IMHO, if you have that many enterprise clients, you can’t just nuke product support without a press release that explains the rationale. It’s safer to explain the reasoning and as the last few sentences indicated, help them transition to a new IDE that works with your product.