• moeggz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    FSD as it is currently with human supervision is 10x safer than driving without FSD. Source Tesla 2025 Q2 report vs reports from NHTSA.

    Edit: some time in and I’ve only gotten ad hominem responses insults and downvotes. Please make a convincing argument that I’m wrong or maybe realize you’re just downvoting facts you don’t like if you don’t bring your own.

    Edit: non Tesla source showing only two fatalities over all FSD miles, no matter what number you come up with for miles with FSD even at 10% of Teslas reported numbers it’s safer than a human.

    tesladeaths.com

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      I can’t think of a less trustworthy source. Rolling a pile of dice with words on them is likely to tell the truth more often.

      • moeggz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        Fair enough. The NHTSA probe is for 2.9 million vehicles and 53 incidents. That is far below the level of incidents humans have over that span of vehicles for any appreciable level of drive time.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 days ago

          The same NHTSA that had its employees removed from these probes by the person being investigated?

          • moeggz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            23 days ago

            Do you think a car that alerts you if you look away from the road and forces you to pay attention or you lose your ability to use the new features is less safe than a vehicle that is unaware if the driver is texting/sleeping or whatever?

            What type of source would you trust on this? If you don’t trust NHTSA what is your basis for saying Tesla FSD is unsafe?

            • mad_djinn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              the safest thing to do, is to not drive at all! I never trusted humans anyways, with their strange motivations, and how inconsistent their behavior. its best if we let go and let the machines take us where they will

              • moeggz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 days ago

                No disagreement that the safer option is not driving at all.

                I don’t think a car driving itself where you tell it is giving up human self determination tho.

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              Do you think Tesla invented that concept? Also clearly the systems don’t work. There are literally pornographic films of people fucking in the back seat while nobody is driving.

              I agree that it is incredibly harmful that we don’t have any scientific institutions that we can trust now that the Nazi ruined them. There is no replacement.

              • moeggz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 days ago

                I never claimed that Tesla invented that system just stated that cars with it (teslas others) are safer than the majority of ones without.

                Your second sentence is impossible with the way the system works, perhaps pornos aren’t good sources for accurate information?

                If there’s no replacement for solid trustworthy data in your mind I don’t think this is a worthwhile conversation if you will trust literally no source.

                • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Are you really rejecting reality? Just go on YouTube and you can find plenty of non-porn videos of people defeating the shitty attention system. I just chose porn as an example to show just how absurd your trust in Daddy Nazi’s lies is.

                  • moeggz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    23 days ago

                    Share me a video of the current version 13.2.9 being easily tricked.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      You know what, you’re right.

      You know what has an even better safety track record than a car with FSD supervised by a human?

      Trains.

      If your concern is actually safety, advocate for the safest methods of transportation - mass public transit, coupled with pedestrian- and bicycle-safe roads, and advocate against passenger cars, in any form.

      • moeggz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        I would love walkable cities. I frequently bike to work you’ll get no disagreement from me there.

      • moeggz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Those are financial documents if they’re lying and you can prove it sue them and make some money lol

          • moeggz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            This conversation isn’t productive. Agree to disagree have a nice day.

            Edit: lol still downvoting me while you never provided your “easy to find” video showing FSD is easily fooled. Downvotes and mocking don’t make a good argument.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      I don’t have stats, but my personal feeling is that car safety features trump full self driving.

      Eg, you are actively driving (which ensures you are engaged and dont fall asleep, etc), but if the car sees something it can react (drifting out of lane, car slows down ahead of you, person walks in road, etc).

      That seems so much safer in my opinion.

      (That works for driving around town, ofc I think adaptive cruise control + the above safety features is safe for highways, etc)

      • moeggz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        For the moment absolutely, that’s why the system requires your attention and will lock you out of using it fairly quickly if you are distracted. Tesla drivers on FSD are forced by their car to pay attention to the road. Surely people can see how that alone makes it safer than all of the cars that don’t know their driver is texting or whatever in a car that can’t drive itself at all.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          Tesla drivers on FSD are forced by their car to pay attention to the road.

          i’ve personally seen this not to be true and it’s not hard to find videos verifying my position.

          • moeggz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            Could you please share a video showing this demonstrated on version 13.2.9? I will happily watch and admit you were right if you can find a video of the current version being easily tricked.

            Edit: To anyone reading this comment in the future think about what is revealed when not only is a video provided but I’m downvoted for merely asking for it.

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          If it can ensure you are looking at the road, that sounds good.

          Not sure if it seems as safe as you in full operation of the car for turns etc around town, but its a good safety feature to ensure you arent distracted.

          • moeggz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            23 days ago

            Not only can it, it is a required part of FSD. You can not operate it without it making sure your eyes are on the road. Every source looking at actual incidents per mile driven shows that FSD (and Waymo and the others) is already safer than human drivers. I’d be happy to be proven wrong on that.

            There are incidents. It’s not perfect, but right now that’s why humans must still be actively paying attention.

      • moeggz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Care to respond to my argument with reason or evidence and not resort to ad-hominem?

          • moeggz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            Calling me stupid is attacking my character in my view but sure I mislabeled it when it was an insult. Your point?

              • moeggz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 days ago

                Again you’ve yet to actually debate my sources or provide your own. You may continue to insult me or mock me as much as you want but I’m not interested in a conversation without actual discussion of the facts.

                • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  I’m not interested in a conversation without actual discussion of the facts.

                  are you sure? that seems to be far from the case, as you must get the last word in. now we’re just teasing you for fun.