Wait until critizism of The Glorious Party and Our Beloved Supreme Leader is considered “piracy”.
Motherfucker, I used to have a vaporwave looken one of this due to a decoding error on an old phone and was going to post it but now I can’t find the sombitch. Fack.
For people who hate the government, they sure like using it to oppress everyone else.
Meta, X, and ChatGPT have all automated mass piracy of art, music, articles, and anything their genAI touches. Surely you mean to start there?
Its only illegal when peasants do it, not when billionaires do it. *
*it being anything.
They want to lock down file sharing so no one else can use the data to build AI now that they have it
deleted by creator
An who decides what is piracy? The facists? This is a bad idea.
meaning, “Block whichever sites we say.”
Yet another FREEDOM bill from the Party of FREEDOM
FREEDUMB! 'Merica, fuck yeah!!
Yet another FREEDOM™ bill from the Party of FREEDOM™
FTFY
I have a seedbox in a country that gives no fucks, so I’ll just use a DNS provider in a country that gives no fucks. You can make it harder, but you can’t make it impossible.
And it’s not like it’s so much harder to press a few extra buttons. Bonus: you’re safer online, so if anyone wants to go down the road, they’ll just be safer online.
They’re all a bunch of fucking idiots, the people making these bills.
Wish people would realize they are NOT idiots.
This erodes privacy and allows character assassinations on anyone who wants to be safe and/or private by using those VPN that do not comply. Is your mega ISP really going to stand up for your rights under this? Can you really get a new ISP at the “press of a few buttons”?
You aren’t the only one here not understanding how “this doesn’t directly affect me” bc you have the technical skills to avoid it. It does affect you, even if only by the chilling effect of it being more difficult to discuss online.
Well, they are idiots, for “as long as men die, liberty will never perish”. But that doesn’t mean they are harmless, we do need to push back against anything like this, not just allow it to happen because “I can press a few buttons”
Non of the people pirating content have money to buy more stuff. These tens of billions they talk about don’t exist.
Non of the people pirating content have money to buy more stuff
How DARE you!
My piracy is morally; not financially driven
If you’re using a semi colon, you need to make sure it’s a stand-alone sentence on both sides.
If you’re using standalone as an adjective, you need to make sure it’s hyphenated or a single word.
Thanks, fixed
Mine’s mostly financial, my moral objection is to streaming shows where, even if you have money, you can’t buy the show on DVD.
Though I wonder if streaming legally and ripping illegally would be the next viable option. Netflix’s 720p streams are largely unprotected.
You think they care about things like facts, or logic? No. This is, and always has been about control.
Even the business side of things know piracy doesn’t actually hurt business, it helps it. They’ve conducted studies on this since 2004. They found that the vast majority of pirates are actually the biggest spenders. They found more often than not a pirate will download a movie, or an album or a game, or whatever. Then within a month buy that same thing they just pirated.
Thats the reason you used to see these record labels try to stop piracy back in the days of kazaa and napster, and limewire. There used to be lawsuits where they’d sue some household for 20 million dollars. Knowing they don’t have it. Well what ended up happening is they ended up suing this elderly man who had no idea what limewire was. He didn’t know how to use a computer. And the only one who used the computer was the 8 year old boy, who now had to live with his grandpa, because both his parents were killed by a drunk driver. Now this record label was trying to put his grandfather 20 million in debt. For someone who had no idea who the black eyed peas. When they kept asking him about it, he asked why they kept asking him about soup if this was about music theft.
As the case went on, it was revealed that between his parents, and other family members, he had a cd collection, including the albums accused of stealing, worth over $5,000 worth of cds.
The whole thing turned the public against record labels, and painted them as the bad guys for trying to ruin peoples lives over music. To this day I haven’t heard of another time they tried that tactic.
And the republicans know this.
You have to remember one thing. The cruelty is the point. It doesn’t need to make sense. It just needs to punish their enemies. And at times even punish their own base. I saw a story last night where a guy who voted for trump was complaining that insulin used to be $6, and now it’s $80 under trumps new plan. And he said “I didn’t think it would happen to ME!”
And thats where we are right now. Just leaving the fuck around stage. Now entering the find out portion of our journey.
I would be surprised if most US politicians are capable of understanding the concept of duplicating files on a computer
“…it’s more like a series of tubes.”
You are correct. It’s like expecting car salesmen to be able to understand how to do brain surgery.
Most politicians are failed lawyers. And if they are too incompetent or corrupt to be representing people or entities in court, they sure are hell shouldn’t be making calls about anything in society or in the political realm. And that obviously includes technology.
Remember when late Alaska Senator Ted Stevens described (with great confidence) that the Internet “is like a series of tubes”? Classic example of their wider incompetence right there.
that guy made ytmnd twice as entertaining back in the day
how do they plan to enforce this with foreign VPNs?
Don’t try to explain technology to them. It won’t work.
You see, it’s a series of tubes…
Oh, I run a new company called FaceMeta, and this is all being stolen for “training” - therefore perfectly 100% legal according to capitalism
“Site-blocking orders force any service provider, from residential broadband providers to global DNS resolvers, to disrupt traffic from targeted websites simply accused of copyright infringement.”
I know a few sites I can accuse of copyright infringement… (x, M$, FB, etc.)
Peer to peer it is.
Then they’ll make certain ports illegal
Peer to peer running on Port 443, the standard port for https, as we do now using stealth vpns and such.
VPNs?
… ok good luck
