Google has put artificial intelligence at the front and center of its search bar. The most-visited site on the internet still shows the same list of links to users, but they have to scroll past a summarized response from an AI chatbot, a feature Google calls AI Overviews. The change to what was once the gateway to the rest of the internet has been profound, and the browsing habits of billions of people are shifting.

…

  • detren@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Even without the AI overview there’s so many AI written articles in search results that it’s hard to get through the noise. Limiting search to pre 2022 only does so much when you want information on something recent.

    I don’t miss the old Google, I miss the old Internet :(

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      theres entire AI generated websites that are just filled with popular key words and bullshit to put it at the top of the search results.

      SEO is as bad as AI when it comes to finding shit on the internet.

      I miss the old internet too, before we even had search engines… when the only way to find a webpage was a webring, or the internet yellow pages… which was just a directory of all known urls at the time.

  • Ninja876@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Screw that I miss old school spiders/crawlers. If you knew how to search them correctly you could find “pass dumps” and all kinds of weird shit you can’t find now days.

    Now every search is ranked bullshit and ads. Dead internet is here and only going to get worse…

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They’ll bring old Google back and call it Google Classic. They will also have a Google Zero, with zero calories, and, of course, Google with a lemon twist.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      more like they’ll call it google classic, and charge you 25 dollars a month for the privledge of using it.

      but don’t worry, after 6 months they’ll start putting AI and ads back into it.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        but don’t worry, after 6 months they’ll start putting AI and ads back into it.

        What? No way they’d do the thing Disney just did!

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I just wish I’d discovered sooner that there are search engines based in other countries that work wonderfully without all the junk, like Mojeek.

    If you’re looking for Google alternatives, I made a video on the topic earlier this year.

  • (des)mosthenes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    you have to scroll maybe 1000-1800px now to get to results (past ai and sponsored results) - shit is trash - searxng good enough; just annoying to maintain sometimes when needed in a pinch m. degoog not bad either

      • (des)mosthenes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I use a mix of water fox & un googled chromium - but don’t even use google anyway; searxng 95% of the time. was just complaining about the poor UX of modern google

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Wanted to second Firefox +ublock. I’ve been using that combo since last year and it is very potent.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      there is SO GOD DAMN MUCH AI slop on youtube… especially in the shorts. Which I fucking hate shorts, Shorts is literally just the same infinite scrolling addiction driven bullshit that Facebook is being sued over, because google thought “We don’t have to not be evil anymore, so lets develop our own cocaine… with blackjack, and hookers!”

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I was listening to a jazz station that was marked as AI, and I have so many questions. Am I listening to an AI’s music is an AI running the playlist I have no idea what is AI about the station but I sure do like zoning out to it.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You can also append -ai to exclude AI summaries. I built myself a little homepage with a bunch of widgets and a selection of search engines linked to one search field, with AI defaulting to off.

    I’ve set this to be my Firefox “new tab” page, so when I open a new tab, it pops open, and I can search right away or check weather, external IP address, ECT.

    Yalls are welcome to use it too if you find it useful:

    https://mediaplate.au/

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The most-visited site on the internet still shows the same list of links to users

    Are you motherfucking kidding me with that? Is this some kind of satire?

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I don’t miss old Google, I stopped using Google instead, except for Google Scholar, which has been left in peace so far by the slopification.

  • voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    searxng fixes a lot of this. it aggregates and consolidates results from many search engines of your choice. no ai. no ad

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Many times that AI summary is just something that is in the first two or three links anyway

    • DougPiranha42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That is, randomly mixed up statements from a few different Reddit threads completed with hallucinated info and delivered with total confidence. Perfect, if you don’t need correct information, just some text.
      However, if you need information, now you either scroll through the summary and start glancing through the top results, or you start reading the summary, hover over the “sources “, guess which one may the statement actually come from, read it, and check it the source seems valid and the summary is accurate.
      I’d argue that the summary is a net negative under both scenarios. It would be great to get quicker answers, if you could trust it, but because you can’t, it’s not.

  • Corvidae@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you can figure out how to deny google the right to script on your browser, AI Overviews will disappear.