Ironically, the initiative was reportedly complicated by the fact that Elon Musk’s DOGE squad had laid off the CISA agents who would have known how to actually break into voting machines.
Article casually assuming that some vulnerability existed to exploit. The more journalistically-responsible way to phrase it would’ve been something more like “the CISA agents with expertise who might have been able to find a way to break into voting machines.”
The first stone has fallen out of the wall. I hope it leads to more. If you look at the various numerical anomalies that occurred in swing states only, it becomes very plausible that Harris actually won.
- Mail-in votes closely reflected polling, but election-night voting (i.e. on the machines) contradicted the polls.
- Split-ticket voting occurred much more often than usual - in this case, ballots with a vote for Trump and votes for Democrats the rest of the way. This does happen in elections, but not nearly to the degree it happened in the swing states.
- The anomalies were always enough for Trump to win, but just below the thresholds that would trigger automatic audits.
Normally vulnerability testing would be a good thing, but in this case I think it’s safe to assume the worst motivations for it.
Early voters are reporting some hijinks when selecting their choice so be VERY CAREFUL about confirming who you are voting for.
I know I am going to be checking in to make sure my vote was counted and counted for the people I want to win. You should to.
How do we check how or if our vote counts.
Early voters are reporting some hijinks when selecting their choice so be VERY CAREFUL about confirming who you are voting for.
So everyone who was involved in pushing that order is going to jail right?
Right?
The administration wanted a voting machine hacked, but DOGE had already fired the experts capable of doing it. Apparently the one thing stopping a potential election conspiracy was Elon Musk’s ability to make government incompetent at absolutely everything. Task failed successfully.
There is no such thing as security if you have physical access to the device. So yes, I am sure they could “hack” it. (Remove storage, alter the votes, re-insert storage).
That doesn’t mean elections are compromised. It means one machine is compromised.
The storage had better be encrypted and locked to the machine it was installed on. It’s such a basic thing that…shit, yep they probably didn’t do it.
deleted by creator
if he wanted them to disclose and fix the issues that would be great
If that’s what he wanted, he wouldn’t have done it secretly.
