• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t really understand why voting machines are complicated enough that there are feasible vulnerabilities. They have one job, and it’s to count. It really shouldn’t be too tough for a crack team of competent devs to write the software required to make them work securely. No network access, a memory safe language, and strict business rules should be relatively trivial to setup. Double that will external audits and you’ve got yourself a stew.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The likely motive:

    “My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don’t like,” one of the former officials told ProPublica. “This goes against everything CISA represents.”

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Do vulnerabilities in voting software typically get disclosed to the public? Is there a CVE list somewhere that I can browse?