• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    NASA helped keep SpaceX alive when it couldn’t make payroll, then spent decades making it indispensable. Now Musk has discovered that launching AI servers pays better than launching astronauts. Outsourcing your space program to one billionaire was a bold leap for mankind, straight into a monopoly with rocket engines.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think it was intentional on NASA, Boeing couldn’t really deliver with starliner and SLS isn’t as good as they hoped either.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        SLS is a congressionally mandated jobs program.

        NASA was forced to use existing shuttle infrastructure instead of developing new hardware with partners. If they had been given freedom, I’m sure we wouldn’t even need SpaceX for anything.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Both are failed companies, but Musk has more money on hand and can keep the lights on for longer.