• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    But look how cute that avatar looks like. It couldn’t do anything bad, look at it …

    No seriously, dressing it up as something happy and cute was an evil genious decision.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I dunno how genius it was. It seems pretty obvious to me. Definitely evil, but let’s not give them too much credit.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        Well, they are the first AI business that are doing it as prominently, aren’t they? So if it is obviously why is that so? I don’t want to give them too much credit for it either but it is certainly a clever strategy.

    • frazw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because nothing bad happened to them… Yet.

      Nothing bad happened the first time the clicked accept on the EULA without reading it. Nor on the 2nd, or 10th or 100th and so they become desensitised to giving up rights and nothing bad happens… Until the nth time.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Meta spent years demonstrating what happens when you trust it with personal data. Now it wants your email, password vault and bank login too. Calling that an AI assistant doesn’t make it less absurd.