• thefactremains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    A dog’s power output comes from its muscle mass, which for a healthy dog is about 45% of its total body weight. This gives our 28-pound dog roughly 12.57 lbs (or 5.7 kg) of muscle.

    Studies of animal muscle show that the peak power output of vertebrate muscle tissue during a short, explosive burst (like a jump or the start of a sprint) is around 100 to 200 watts per kilogram of muscle.

    Now we can estimate the dog’s peak power:

    • Low estimate: 5.7 kg of muscle x 100 W/kg = 570 watts
    • High estimate: 5.7 kg of muscle x 200 W/kg = 1140 watts

    Converting these figures to horsepower (1 horsepower = 746 watts):

    • Low estimate: 570 W / 746 ≈ 0.76 horsepower
    • High estimate: 1140 W / 746 ≈ 1.5 horsepower

    So, a small 28-pound dog might be able to generate a peak power of around 0.75 to 1.5 horsepower for a very brief moment.

    So this YASA motor is somewhere between 670 and 1,340 times more powerful than the dog it’s being compared to in weight. That’s some jaw-dropping power output.

    • officermike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      I tried to sanity-test the math here running the same calculations on a 700 kg horse, of which around 50% mass is muscle.

      700 kg x 50% = 350 kg

      Low:

      350 kg x 100 W/kg = 35,000 W

      35,000 W / 746 ≈ 47 hp

      High:

      350 kg x 200 W/kg = 70,000 W

      70,000 W / 746 ≈ 94 hp

      Despite what the term “horsepower” would seem to suggest, a horse can actually output more than one horsepower. Estimates put peak output of a horse around 12-15 hp. By those numbers, even the low end estimate above is around 3-4x too high. We’re gonna need more dogs.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I appreciate the sanity check, but just to throw a monkey wrench into your model…

        I think the square-cube law will bite you here. I expect power/mass isn’t constant. Mass grows faster than cross-sectional area which is key in muscle performance.

      • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Horsepower was originally used to describe the work that a horse could do over the course of an hour. Specifically, the number of times an hour a horse could turn a mill wheel at a brewery. These are estimates of peak power, not sustained power, so I would say that it’s accurate that horses can produce significantly more than one horsepower in short bursts.

    • postnataldrip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m guessing that would be if every muscle was being used for propulsion at any given time. You’d need to allow for heart and lungs, as well as face, neck, tail muscles that don’t contribute to power output, plus legs don’t provide continuous power as they need to make a return trip.

      If we really wanted to optimise a dog for power:weight there are quite a few systems we could do away with. But it would likely result in a less floofy doggo, so it’s obviously not an option.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Stop burning the planet down to generate social media comments about shit you don’t understand