The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

  • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ok. You spend the rest of your life in jail, and your immediate and extended family can live.

    They won’t be rich. They will be held accountable if they broke the law as well.

    Or we can exterminate 50-100k people to give justice to billions.

    Either option is acceptable to me.

  • bashibazouk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s not a matter of privacy or safety. It’s a matter of how does this technology benefit me? So far, that’s none at all. I live in a place of low crime, so it’s ability to keep me safer is minor if at all. Police abuse it and the upper classes seem safe from it. I do not see any benefit in it’s current form. Lock it down behind court orders without general police/organizational access and maybe? But I’ll still vote against it…

  • darkmarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My privacy and freedom are invaluable to me, I don’t give 2 shits about some CEOs profits. He can go rot in a ditch for all I care.