

Mmm. Wake me up when there’s 3rd party confirmation of these things that isn’t just a marketing ploy.


Mmm. Wake me up when there’s 3rd party confirmation of these things that isn’t just a marketing ploy.


Thank you for explaining my country’s specific traffic situation to me.


It can depend on your locale. I live in a country where outside of highways, posted speed limits are a joke. The cops would probably honk you if you were going the posted limit on a non highway road.


Within reason. Libel, incitement to violence, hate speech, etc, should be illegal for obvious reasons


At that point, you (well, not you per se) are basically suggesting to replace the telephone system with a Signal-esque system. Which would break a billion things in real life, for little to no gain.


Still not seeing how it would work. You’re dropping random bits of the system and saying it would work but it’s too complicated for you to explain, so there’s really nothing to discuss.


Federal political sources downplayed the seriousness of the issue, believing the issue was not related to a data leak or breach.
Sources noted the private contact information for politicians was often already widely available and known by stakeholders and members of the public they had interacted with. Some pointed out that politicians often kept the same contact details for years, from when they were more junior politicians who freely distributed their numbers on public documents like press releases or community announcements.


Would you care to describe how you would implement said system? Because I can’t see how that would work technologically
Which is worse - AI slop, or people decrying everything they see as AI slop, even when it isn’t?