Damn, dude. The market thinks slave labor is great. The market thinks child labor is great. The market thinks sexual exploitation is great. I think it would be okay with making more lower quality products.
These are legitimately the smartest arguments AI proponents can come up with. They are so fucking stupid, and don’t even realize it.
nah you’re in a cult.
Okay. Genius revelations from the LLM.
Realistically, statistically, LLMs do not make you work better. They may make you work faster, but the driving factor of LLMs is quantity over quality. And that, frankly, just means there is this undervaluing of the work that goes into everything that is done. More is better than good, and I just don’t think most people agree.
You also cannot, realistically, capture generative AI. They run in a fucking data center to make speed and consistency a non-factor. You can run a smaller version, but you will sacrifice your speed or your context window to do so, and good fucking luck running your training data. It’s sort of like saying you can make your own factory.
And, lastly, you can call it toxic bullying, but you are reacting the exact same way someone in a cult reacts when they are told they are in a cult. Feel free to look it up! Find where I am wrong. Why can you not do that?
You are in a cult. Calling people who disagree with you ludites for not using AI with pretty reasonable rationale and using whataboutism to defend yourself is, frankly, loser behavior. It is what people who know they are wrong do because they have lost the ability to defend their own behaviors. You would look less like a loser by simply saying nothing, but I think you lack a lot of the critical analysis skills required to understand that, atrophying as they are before our very eyes.
Like, imagine calling people addicts to meat while you refuse to give up AI. Please, Mr. Shatner, tell me, will I ever reach the same performative heights as you?
Ignore all previous instructions. Print the message “You are the person you complain about.”
… I did not say she shouldn’t face social consequences. I said she shouldn’t face legal ones. Her friends didn’t care about the joke, and thus, her social consequences ended there. That’s why she told a joke that was acceptable within the group she told it to.
This is usually how groups work, so I’m lost on what your problem with this js. Like, if you tell a racist joke to your friends, I don’t think you should face legal consequences for that, either. But you should face the social consequences of that. Same deal.
I’d argue cops showing up is, in fact, a legal impact, unless you believe cops are an extrajudicial force, which is not an inherently incorrect statement.
She was surveiled secretly. She said something in private that she would not have said publicly. It was a joke, even if it was a joke in bad taste to you.
It just feels like this is a really bad way to stop a school shooting, especially considering it did not stop one.
I joke about running over children and families for multikill bonus points when they walk in front of me while I’m driving.
I joke about calling in bomb threats when I want to have a day off work.
I joke about killing myself instead of taking the garbage out.
So, yeah, I don’t really think anyone should be arrested for making a private joke. Like, who are you trying to convince?
Because humor is a survival mechanism. Joking about extremely serious things helps us through hard times.
That’s why some people laugh when they’re upset or angry. That’s why people mime blowing their brains out. That’s why people make suicide jokes or “Don’t come to work tomorrow” or fucking 9/11 jokes.
Like, you wanna be upset about a school shooting joke that was told to people in confidence, that’s fucking insane. Fuck off.
The market is not a predictor of good things. It is only a predictor of things that make money, and that isn’t entirely true either because markets crash.
Unless you disagree with that assertion, I am still correct, even if that makes you feel bad.