• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The dispute isn’t that they’re not allowed to use Starlink for murder drones, it’s that the murder drone plan is more expensive.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      SpaceX is not actually supposed to even have direct control over Starshield. It uses Starlink infrastructure, but is a military application that is supposed to be under the control of the federal government.

      SpaceX shouldn’t have the option to pitch different plans.

  • nomoredreaddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Apparently the TOS muskrat claimed were violated by Ukraine using starlink for ‘‘offensive’’ purposes, were really just TOS for the lower paid service level.

  • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The guy that nazi saluted on live broadcast twice did this? Not shocked at all seeing the attrocities the nazis and communists did to the Ukrainian people.

    Either someone buy out Starlink, Space X, and Tesla or create a better company would be great in the current timeline.

  • Rezurektme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I see billboards for Starlink Roam and the tagline is “Roam Anywhere” or something and I’m like “Except for Ukraine, apparently.”

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Starlink fastest growing revenue base is now governments vastly outpacing the growth of their consumer market. It is clear this is the real goal, to weaponize this technology.