• douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They aren’t?

    They are buying up capacity from manufacturers who are stopping production of DRAM and pivot to HBM which is more profitable. Abandoning DRAM which affects a lot more than just “consumer grade RAM”

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      They’re publicly traded companies. Their investor meetings point out that HBM is not more profitable.

      It is in theory more guaranteed profit because it’s a smaller number of bigger contracts. But that’s the gamble they’re making.

      • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        But isn’t it kind of a game of chicken then for the consumer markets? Whoever gambles the other way, can win in both volume and availability, being able to cut the others off market just by pricing, enabled by the prior two points, get brand points by the ladle while at it, and kind of become a staple of the consumer market. When the bubble pops and others return, the market isn’t the same and everyone else sits at a disadvantage?

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Yes.

          Which is why it’s bad that the only 3 companies with capacity currently are colluding.