• angband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Then, in a few years, they’ll offer advertisers super premium ads. Users will be able to buy ultra premium tier subscriptions to skip those.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Wait - they pay . . . for “Premium” . . . and still have fucking ads?

    lol

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They’re talking about the ads in podcasts put there by the podcasters. Not ads put there by Spotify.

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I have premium family, but the only ads I hear are the ones that creaters put in themselves. I don’t mind those as much.

      Edit: what joe said

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Its akin to paying for a movie and being pissed off that Mercedes paid to have their car in it.

      The people we are listening to have sponsors and deals. I would prefer they didnt but it is what it is.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    YouTube is doing the same thing.

    I noticed my Android TV, with the built in YouTube app, auto skips the YouTuber’s sponsor segment.

    It’s not SponsorBlock, just plain YouTube.


    It’s about control.

    Google/Spotify don’t get a cut from direct sponsorships. They can’t have that.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ad skipping sounds wonderfully pro consumer until you remember somebody has to pay for the podcast: If listeners skip every ad, block tracking and still expect endless free shows, the economics eventually stop working. You can’t demand independent media while systematically deleting the mechanism that funds it.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “premium users”

      It’ll probably work like YouTube premium, a cut of that users sub will go to the artist

      Anecdotally, creators seem to make more from premium viewers than ad supported ones

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Another shit take from the resident LLM adbot.

      You’re already paying for premium. You shouldn’t have to listen to ads.

      Edit: in case anyone is wondering, yes, the account I am replying to is a bot that in a few months time will likely start promoting the stuff it’s already promoing on its profile (which is a website that advertises via bots) or it will advertise a product that paid for this bot to do deceptive marketing.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Spotify has too many users and control over the industry, nothing good can come from that. Do your part and stop using it.

  • Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Congratulations on reproducing the technology brought to us by DVRs decades ago!

  • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s fine when I do it, but introducing this as default in Spotify will reduce the value of ad-reads, and I’m guessing Spotify won’t make up the difference to producers.