• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    It doesn’t need to be so, the asshole billionaires just don’t give a single fuck about anyone but themselves. They don’t even care about their kids.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Remember that Stargate SG1 episode where they find themselves into a huge underground facility that is under attack by external forces. Jack O’Neill accepts to pilot one of their drones to help defend the complex from a wave of bombers and is infuriated to learn that the attacker’s bombers were manned while he believed they were unmanned.

    spoiler

    At the end it turns out the facility was actively poisoning the entire planet, threatening to wipe out all life and the “attackers” were simply the people of the rest of the world trying to stop it.

    That is what the Amazon data center is to me.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    It would also be in stark defiance of Amazon’s stated climate goals, which center on reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

    That’s not lost on the tech giant. But as Amazon spokesperson Margaret Callahan told the NYT, the “world looks different now than when we co-founded the climate pledge.”

    What the fuck? They looked at the world recently and said “yeah, climate change isn’t as much of a problem as it was before”?!?

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they looked at the blatant corruption from Fatboy McKiddieFiddlers regime and figured, “eh, what’s the point of pretending to give a shit. No fucker has got the balls to stop us from fucking thing up.”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m so glad I never procreated.

    With any luck I’ll croak before the worst effects of these decisions manifest.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The red run deregulated Texas Oblast allowed this shit. Kiss the water supplies and eventually the local economy good-bye.

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yay Texas the business-friendly state. As if billionaires aren’t raping the planet and all of us hard enough, the lone star state is always looking for way to pump their penises just a little bit bigger.

  • ryphez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Weren’t they supposed to be carbon neutral by 2030? Sure seems like they’re trending the wrong way

  • Shindo66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know this will be buried but it seems Ai isn’t worth anything really if these giant complexes are the price. Just straight up monetarily, who benefits?

    • floppybiscuits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fossil fuel companies. Waha natural gas prices are super depressed in that area so it would be a big boon to the pricing environment there.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Did they think what would happen if the gas price goes up and their profitability is completely dependent on that?

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Growth and sustainability don’t have to be in opposition — in fact, our results show they reinforce each other.”

    Oh yeah, makes total sense guy.

  • Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everything but run them on renewable energy.

    Papa trump and his minions need their money

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe when Trump is dead and gone, they’ll switch to solar. Solar’s gotta be MUCH cheaper for them in the long run anyway, and frees them of ties to industries known for being exploitative.

  • Waffelmeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Almost every day I have a fight with my gf over her Amazon account. I told her we can not proceed with a meaningful relationship if she doesn’t cancel it. Am I the crazy one?

    • tzrlk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes. The effect of one person’s passive boycott is nothing. If you’re serious enough to sabotage your own relationships over this, then perhaps focus instead on a greater boycott campaign, or actively pushing for legislation to actually make a difference.

      Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face.

      • odioLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The effect of one person’s passive boycott is nothing.

        This is some centrist capitalism-enabling shit. The sum of our individual efforts can amount to great things. Boycotts have been a great tool against fascism throughout history.

        • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          @Waffelmeister@lemmy.world is actually boycotting his relationship. I do not think it is wise for him to try to force her into submission rather than leading by a lifetime of example proving that one can get by just fine without Amazon and inspiring rather than coercing her to leave.

          • odioLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Let’s remind ourselves this is a company actively supporting genocide.

            force her into submission

            coercing her to leave

            You conclude there’s forcing and coercion from 2 sentences? I just see two people with apparently incompatible moral values about consumption. I don’t see any forcing or coercion. I think it’s a very valid reason. If he has or is willing to put patience into the relationship is also a decision he has to take.

            • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Okay, so could you name alternate companies to move to that have definitely spoken against Zion? I’m certainly not pro-Amazon and am aware of the chokehold that AWS has on the entire Internet, but it sure seems there are fewer alts than we would hope. Also, how is an ultimatum not forcing?

              • odioLemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Why do I have to name alternatives for you? I also find manipulative that the alternatives you seek from me MUST have definitely spoken against Zionist entity, when just not participating would be enough.

                I think stating your boundaries about who you want to be with is not forcing. Would be forcing if his gf was dependable on him or there was emotional manipulation involved…

                • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  What I mean is that isn’t it hard to prove whether a company actually is supporting Israel unless they’ve been outright about being against it? I’m not trying to test you; I’m literally curious about what some of these are.

                  Also, is what he’s doing not emotional manipulation? “Ultimatum” or not, the exact wording doesn’t matter; if he really cares about continuing the relationship, He should be actively helping her find alternatives to the products that she would normally buy from Amazon and even link them to her to make it easy to move. He’s putting the work on her; that’s lazy and rude and controlling when he doesn’t even want to help her help the switch. Does that make sense?

    • odioLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Imho there are different aspects to this: are they binge buying useless stuff on Amazon constantly, feeding into mindless consumerism? are there more ethical alternatives available?

      If someone uses Amazon for something they can’t find anywhere else, or that the alternative costs so much more they can’t afford it, then I understand. If they are just a mindless consumer and they do nothing to change that, they lose my respect.

      At the same time, if that is a reason you are considering to break up with someone, imo it tells your relationship is not very solid to start with.

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also don’t take relationship advice from one random person on the internet.

        Get at least two opinions and dump her.